The Law

The Difference Between Forced Marriage and Arranged Marriage (UK Law Explained)

20 July, 2026

Share this post

Understanding the Difference

Forced marriage and arranged marriage are often confused, yet under UK law they are fundamentally different.

An arranged marriage is legal and culturally recognised when both individuals freely consent to the marriage.

A forced marriage is a form of abuse and a criminal offence.

Understanding this distinction is essential for safeguarding professionals, educators, health practitioners, and anyone working with vulnerable individuals.

What is an Arranged Marriage?

An arranged marriage is where families or third parties play a role in introducing or helping to select a potential partner.

Key features include:

  • Free and full consent from both people
  • The ability to say yes or no without pressure
  • No consequences or punishment for refusing
  • Ongoing choice before and after engagement

Under UK law, arranged marriages are lawful because consent remains central.

Family involvement does not make a marriage forced.

What is a Forced Marriage?

A forced marriage occurs when one or both people do not consent, or cannot consent, to the marriage and pressure or abuse is used.

According to UK Government guidance from the Forced Marriage Unit (a joint initiative between the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office and the Home Office), force can include:

  • Emotional or psychological pressure
  • Threats or intimidation
  • Physical or sexual violence
  • Financial control
  • Isolation
  • Immigration-related pressure
  • Honour-based abuse or family coercion

Force does not have to be physical.

Coercion, fear, or emotional manipulation can remove genuine consent.

The Legal Position in the UK

Forced marriage is a criminal offence under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.

It is illegal to:

  • Force someone to marry
  • Take someone abroad to force a marriage
  • Marry someone who lacks capacity to consent

Penalties can include up to seven years’ imprisonment.

The UK Government also provides civil protection through Forced Marriage Protection Orders (FMPOs), designed to prevent a marriage from taking place or protect someone already at risk.

Consent: The Key Legal Difference

The distinction between arranged and forced marriage comes down to one principle:

Consent.

Arranged Marriage:

  • Choice is present,
  • Individuals can refuse
  • Legal in the UK
  • Family involvement is supportive

Forced Marriage

  • Choice is removed
  • Refusal leads to pressure or harm
  • Family involvement is coercive
  • Criminal offence

A person may appear to agree but still be experiencing force.

Professionals must look beyond verbal agreement.

Who is at Risk?

UK Government safeguarding guidance highlights that forced marriage can affect:

  • Children and young people
  • Adults with care and support needs
  • Individuals facing honour-based abuse
  • LGBTQ+ individuals
  • People experiencing immigration or dependency pressures

Both women and men can be victims, although women and girls are disproportionately affected.

Forced marriage is recognised as a form of domestic abuse and child abuse.

Warning Signs and Indicators

Forced marriage is rarely disclosed directly.

Possible indicators include:

  • Behavioural Signs
  • Sudden withdrawal from education or work
  • Decline in attendance or performance
  • Increased monitoring by family members
  • Fearfulness about upcoming travel abroad
  • Control and Restriction
  • Limited freedom or social isolation
  • Removal of passport or identity documents
  • Restrictions on friendships or relationships
  • Direct Indicators
  • Talking about an unwanted engagement
  • Self-harm, anxiety, or depression linked to family expectations
  • Previous siblings married young or overseas

No single indicator confirms forced marriage, but patterns matter.

Professional Responsibilities

UK Government guidance stresses that forced marriage is a safeguarding issue, not a cultural matter.

Professionals should:

  • Treat concerns as potential abuse
  • Speak to the individual alone and safely
  • Take disclosures seriously
  • Follow safeguarding procedures immediately
  • Seek specialist advice where needed

Never:

  • Attempt mediation with family members
  • Inform relatives without consent
  • Send someone abroad to resolve concerns

These actions can significantly increase risk.

The Role of the Forced Marriage Unit

The Forced Marriage Unit provides:

  • Confidential advice to professionals
  • Support for victims in the UK and overseas
  • Assistance with emergency repatriation
  • Guidance on legal protections

They operate a national helpline for both victims and practitioners.

Cultural Sensitivity vs Safeguarding

Professionals may fear causing offence or appearing culturally insensitive.

However:

  • Forced marriage is not a cultural practice, it is abuse.
  • Safeguarding must always take priority over cultural assumptions.

Avoid:

  • Minimising risk due to cultural context
  • Assuming consent because family approval exists
  • Treating forced marriage as a private family matter

Respecting culture does not mean ignoring harm.

Professional Curiosity in Forced Marriage Cases

As with domestic abuse, professional curiosity is essential.

Ask yourself:

  • Is consent genuinely free?
  • Who benefits from the marriage?
  • Can the individual safely refuse?
  • Are they able to speak privately?
  • What might they fear if they say no?

Apparent agreement does not always equal real choice.

Safeguarding Actions

  • Record concerns clearly and factually
  • Share information according to safeguarding procedures
  • Consider immediate risk, including travel plans
  • Seek advice early rather than waiting for disclosure
  • Use supervision to explore uncertainty

Early intervention can prevent irreversible harm.

Key Messages

  • Arranged marriage is legal when consent exists
  • Forced marriage is abuse and a criminal offence
  • Consent must be free, informed, and ongoing
  • Family pressure can invalidate consent
  • Forced marriage is a safeguarding issue, not a cultural one
  • Professional curiosity and early action save lives

A simple safeguarding question to remember:

“Do they truly have a choice?”

If the answer is uncertain, further exploration is required.

Share this post

More...

‘Hysterical’

Calling women ‘hysterical’ if they appear distressed, upset or disturbed often discounts their experiences. Other labels used can include, but are not limited to, “unstable” or “over-reacting”, “unable to keep their emotions in check”.  These statements are routed in sexism.

Another thing to note is that the description of being hysterical is provided by the alleged abuser. Often abusers will try to manipulate professionals in a bid to sabotage the victims’ credibility and to minimise or detract from the abuse.

Language is extremely important in documentation as the documentation will provide a narrative of what is happening and will often determine what course of action will be needed next.

Documentation may be called for as evidence in both civil and criminal cases, including family court for protective orders or child contact arrangements.

‘Male appeared calm and assisted with enquiries’
We cannot assume that because one party displays anger and aggression or is less in control of their emotions that they are a primary perpetrator. It is a myth that perpetrators “lose control” or have anger management issues when they abuse their partners. Domestic violence is the most often, the opposite of losing control; perpetrators know what they are doing and use their abusive tactics of choice to maintain dominance in the relationship.
Verbal argument only
It is important to remember that many couples argue, but for an argument to escalate to the point that the neighbours fear for a person’s safety that they phone the police on the emergency number, this should warrant further in-depth investigation. Statements such as “verbal argument only” will minimise harm and fear caused by verbal abuse. In turn it will also minimise the victims experience of the incident. The danger of using language that may minimise an abusive incident is that it will send a message to victims that the act was not abusive and if the victim felt it was abusive then they are over-reacting. Over time, this can lead to an escalation of abuse if the warning signs are not spotted, or intervention is not offered at the earliest opportunity. Furthermore, the statement ‘Verbal Argument Only’ suggests that only physical violence is worthy of investigation. However, the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 defines domestic abuse as:  Behaviour is “abusive” if it consists of any of the following—
  • (a)physical or sexual abuse;
  • (b)violent or threatening behaviour;
  • (c)controlling or coercive behaviour;
  • (d)economic abuse (see subsection (4));
  • (e)psychological, emotional or other abuse;
The act makes it clear that verbal abuse is part of domestic abuse.